From the VCC newsletter on 10/22:Science and Religion

I want to focus on how we deal with the relationship between science and Christianity.

For many years a biblical worldview worked to the benefit of science and engineering, giving western society an edge in the world. By believing in God’s created order, western civilization was confident that God had ordained the laws of the universe and given us the ability to observe and live in harmony with these laws. While there has always been the religious who rejected science and discovery (mostly out of fear), most of the foundational discoveries that propelled western society and science forward were discovered by men who had studied theology and were ordained members of the clergy.

For example:

• Sir Isaac Newton, the father of physics, was a theologian as well as a mathematician and scientist.  

• Sir Francis Bacon, the founder of scientific method, rejected atheism as “shallow.”

• Johannes Kepler, an astronomer who developed our modern understanding of a heliocentric solar system, was a strong believer in God.

• Galileo Galilei believed his ideas were not in conflict with the Bible, but in conflict with his friend, a pope whom he offended.

• Blaise Pascal, a French mathematician, physicist, inventor and theologian, was known for his work in geometry, invented the first mechanical calculator, and also authored  a defense of Christianity.

• Robert Boyle, who discovered Boyle’s law of gases, was also a theologian.  

• George Mendel, the father of modern genetics, wrote about the mathematical foundations of genetics and was also an Austrian monk and the abbot of his monastery.

• Lord William Kelvin, head of the Royal Academy of science and inventor and father of modern physics, was an old earth creationist.  

• Albert Einstein, the father of theoretical physics and the theory of relativity, believed in a personal God and was a defender of religious liberty.

Most of our top universities began as training centers for clergy (Harvard, Georgetown, Notre Dame, Yale, Princeton, and Boston College). These schools saw nothing incompatible between science and religion, and the early conflicts between these schools and the church had more to do with politics than religion. Today, there is a great divide between academia and the Christian church. Modern Christian colleges rarely do research or participate in the advancement of science and technology. There are very few Christian researchers and scientists. In fact, most complain that the church is who pushed them away. At the same time the  biligerence of academics toward Christian faith has escalated to the point that many Christian professors are under siege and afraid to speak their minds. Christian students complain about being intimidated for sharing their faith. The hostility between the church and the academic world has become intolerable, and in response the church has hastened into full retreat. Meanwhile films like Ben Stein’s Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed have not made the environment any more receptive. But here is the question: whose job is it to be more civil?

My point is three fold. Firstly, science, logic, technology and the Bible are not incompatible. We have nothing to fear, even when they seem to contradict, because today’s cutting-edge science may be next year’s joke. Today’s scientist mock medical technology from 100 years ago, and astronomers are still fighting about whether or not Pluto is a planet. When we fear science and react negatively to scientific discovery, we reinforce the idea that Christians are not intelligent and close-minded.  Instead, build up a basic knowledge of apologetics (defending the what you believe). It is reasonable to know the basics of the origin of the Bible, scientific flaws with macro-evolution, the merits in micro-evolution, as well as proofs from genetics and other scientific disciplines so we can have assurance that science and technology are not incompatible with our faith.

Secondly, we cannot expect the world to change and “play nice.”  They have no motivation to be less mean (in math, the mean is average, and in society the average is mean).  So how do we enter the world of science and technology? How do we engage scientists, engineers, and the technological with the gospel in meaningful ways? A few years ago I had a person with a science background come to church and during a discussion on Genesis.  He asked a few innocent questions. He wanted to understand, but instead of simple answers he was scolded by several people. I had to defend him for even asking the questions. He has never attended our church again. Many scientists I know are afraid to go to church because they feel unwelcome. Those who attend church tend to disguise their vocation when asked to avoid being ostracized. This should not be the defensive nature of people whose prime directive comes from John 3.16. A confident people of God ought to be the most willing to hear other opinions and respond with grace and mercy.   

Thirdly, how we interact with the world is as important as what we say we believe. Don't feel the need to win every discussion as if every conversation is an argument; Sometimes people are just processing their own beliefs.

While these articles on Sages for the Religion of None are not exhaustive, the primary point is: don’t try to be the expert. Be the voice of wisdom and experience for those who are traveling this journey of life alongside of us. Help those looking for answers, those who believe  most of the questions being asked are not a rejection of God, or even religion, but a rejection of old systems and authoritarianism.

From the Vcc newsletter on 10/15: How Sages Validate the Bible

I would like to talk about how we validate the Bible without arguing or demeaning others. A hint: it doesn’t begin with just knowing what it says, but instead it begins with the collection of writings, genres, and even methods of study. We will discuss the history as well as the content of the Bible.

It is important to know what the Bible actually says versus what we believe about it, or what we have been told. Yet there is so much more to validating the Bible in the mind of worldly people than what we think of in the church. For most of us in the church we have been taught to prove the Bible through reason, debate, and proofs. While these things really help build our faith, they generally do very little for post-modern people whose idea of truth is fundamentally different than church folks. For most of them the greatest test of the Bible is you, your life, your attitude toward them, your family, and other believers. Is the Bible life-giving or something harsh, critical, judgmental? Too often we use the Bible and what it says to win an argument, and all that tells non-Christians is they don't need to know anymore about your God or your Bible.

Having the right attitude begins with the very character and nature of the Bible. The Bible is a collection of 66 writings, written over a span of 1,500 years, in four languages. It is a very large body of work, with a lot of cultural assumptions, and time specific events. It is full of history, poetry, wisdom literature, apocalyptic literature, stories, parables, Hebraic law text (which are very different in spirit than Western law codes), and many different writing styles. This ought to humble us and make us recognize that becoming biblically literate is more about being acquainted with the heart of God for his people than knowing all of the content. I have spent the last 30 years of my life learning the content, and I have a long way to go. One of the things I like to teach people who want to become acquainted with the Bible is the big story: the overarching narrative that runs cover to cover, the story of the kingdom of God and the redemption of creation. Once we know that story, our biblical literacy begins to rise, and our attitude can be aligned with the spirit of the whole rather than an attitude expressed in a single text.

Learning about the numerous genres of literature, the complex cultural and historical nature of the text, and magnitude of the Bible itself should make us more patient with people who don’t share our good vibes about the Bible. When people speak half-truths, when they disparage the Bible because of a single text taken out of context, there is nothing to get angry about. They are not stupid, and they are not necessarily doing the work of the devil. It is likely that the Bible has been quoted at them to correct, malign, or to judge them or someone or something they believe. Respecting the giant and complex nature of this text may make us cautious about how we wield a sword around others and help us understand how they might be confused, hold onto misrepresented truth, or feel beat up by the Bible unjustly.

Last, but not least, knowing more about the different kinds of literature, history, and how cultures all fit together in the Bible can help us grow and even be helpful to others. This is why I cannot stress enough the need for courses like Introduction to the Bible and How to Read the Bible for All It’s Worth. Since we, as Christians, are putting so much stock in the Bible it only makes sense that we know its origins, how it is put together, the different kinds of literature, the central theme, and how to read for understanding. So that we might rightly apply the word for the purpose of giving life rather than using it to hurt those we disagree with.

Next week I want to focus on how we deal with the relationship between science and Christianity.

From the VCC newsletter on 10/1: Sage Advice for the Religion of None

Sage Advice for the Religion of None

Last week I spoke about the post-Christian transition in our society, and the move from organized religion toward superstition (or unorganized religion).  In it I stated the two main reasons were, one, the rejection of authority, and two, a lack of critical thinking.

Rejection of Authority

One of the primary issues for the deterioration of authority is the general lack of integrity, transparency, and honesty exercised by authority figures. In the past, those in authority had the luxury of controlling information, so they could reject anything that posed a threat to their authority and the status quo. Because they controlled the information they also controlled the narrative. Today with the free exchange of information and ideas anyone can become an expert in anything. Those in authority, teachers, doctors, lawyers, politicians, clergy, etc., are no longer the dispensers of truth. Instead we have entered an age where leaders can be fact-checked. Even while they are speaking. Even while they are asking for allegiance. If those listening find a lack of clarity, honesty, or integrity in the information, suspicion begins to creep in.  This suspicion is then reflected on the institutions the speaker represents .

Our new role of leaders in the church has ceased to be providers or dispensers of information.  Instead their roles have become that of “biblical sage.” The very concept of a sage is one we lack in modern society. For all of our technology and information, we are not known for wisdom and maturity. We live in an age where there are few fathers, few loveable daddies, and way too many sperm donors. It’s like this: when my kids were little they looked up to me to give them answers about life. As they grew they began to hear other voices and tested them to see what was true. All too often, when I didn’t know the answer, I gave them plausible answers. I stated them as fact, and they believed me. Eventually the competition of other voices caused them to challenge my plausible answers with facts, or different opinions. If my answers started coming up empty, it gave rise to even more complicated questions. My authority was at stake in their lives, most of which was dismissed as growing up. But the truth was this: because I didn’t do research, and instead gave plausible answers, my kids began to doubt my authority and knowledge, and eventually they sought information from other sources that seemed equally as plausible (the internet, teachers, friends, etc). Truth became more subjective than objective and even my role as sage came under fire. I clearly lacked wisdom. While all of this may sound normal, the problem reaches farther than just parenting. The same people who don't do the research at home, don’t do the research for subordinates, laity, students, and anyone else under their authority.

Moving forward, the greatest need is not for the church to reassert its authority nor prove the authority of the Bible, but for the body of Christ and the leaders to be honest, integrous, transparent, and diligent in our handling of God’s Word and the discharging of duties as father’s and mother’s of the faith (2 Timothy 2.1-8). Telling people, "I do not know" is better than giving plausible answers that can be fact-checked and found wanting. But eventually, we must be able to give an account for the hope we have (1 Peter 3.15-16). We are called to be childlike, not childish. We must mature in our faith and become the sages of wisdom among a vast sea of “experts.” The biggest part will be making sure our answers and our character line-up with the advice we give and the things we say we believe.

Next week I want to continue this thread on authority with more ways for us to engage the world as sages of wisdom.