Friday, May 27, 2011

What difference does the reading the Bible make?

A 2009 study by the Center for Bible Engagement (CBE) says that among Christ-followers in their study, the number one indicator of spiritual growth was not church service attendance, as has been the common marker in studies by Gallup and Barna Research, but that a far more accurate marker is amount of time spent reading the Bible. Their reasoning was, the tipping point between action and inaction, seemed to be that those who spent at least four times per week, engaged in Bible reading, were less likely to engage in risky social behaviors, and more likely to share their faith, and know what the Bible actually teaches.[1] The data collected by the CBE would seem to reinforce Whitney’s conclusions about the impact of Bible reading upon discipleship, as it relates to obedience to Christ, and ultimately glorifying God. However, this is not to imply that by ceremonially reading through the Bible that a person will become more like Jesus Christ. In response to this idea Eugene Peterson writes,

The reading style employed more often than not by contemporary Christians is fast, reductive, information-gathering and, above all, practical. We read for what we can get out of it, what we can put to use, what we think we can use– and right now. “We . . . we . . . we . . . we . . .” all the way home.

If we are serious about following Jesus and living out the gift of his life in detail in our bodies and circumstances, we must swim against this whitewater river We and familiarize ourselves with the world in which Jesus and his gift of life are revealed to us. We do it by reading our Scriptures slowly, imaginatively, prayerfully, and obediently. Each adverb is important.[2]

It is precisely this kind of intentional reading and soaking in the Scripture that brings about the deep-seated change that enables the disciple to engage in the vocation of Christ. In his book, Invitation to a Journey, Robert Mulholland points out that much of the literature on discipleship and spiritual formation centers around the assumptions that we are in control of our relationship with God. Thus we believe that we can apply some quick formula fix-it and move on to spiritual wholeness. He suggests that we instead view life more as a journey filled with opportunities to give a faithful response to Christ, and learn to trust God’s control.[3] This is direct conflict with the world of the twenty-first century. Today, people live in what Dallas Willard calls, a society smothered in slogans, and cluttered with commercials, catch words and political slogans which have tiny bits of truth but not enough to live by, that fill the world with noise, and refuse silence.[4] The need is not for more of the same in a Christianized format. Over the last twenty years of American Christianity, there has been an incredible increase in Christian media, but there is no corresponding incredible increase in the number of Christians or in the quality of Christian living to suggest that it has been money well spent for discipleship. The church today needs authentic discipleship that will teach people how to live like Jesus. Willard laments the loss of Jesus’ central role as teacher in the modern church and asks if anyone can name a Christian Education program that regularly (or ever) teaches about “how to love your enemies” or “how to do good to those who persecute you” according to Matthew 5:44.[5] If the vocation of the church is the ministry of Christ, then central to that ministry is the intentional formal and informal discipleship of the individual. Robert Mulholland writes, “Spiritual formation is not an option. Spiritual formation is not a discipline just for “dedicated disciples.” It is not a pursuit only for the pious. Spiritual formation is not an activity for the deeply committed alone. It is not a spiritual frill for those with the time and inclination. Spiritual formation is not a fad. Spiritual formation is the primal reality of life.[6] The church too often, either intentionally or unintentionally, gives the community of faith the impression that all one needs is to get saved, and that everything else is optional, but the discipleship motif is central to the New Testament and to life of the church.



[1]Center for Bible Engagement, Bible Literacy & Spiritual Growth: Survey Results, (Lincoln, NE: Back to the Bible Press, 2006), 16.

[2]Eugene Peterson, A Long Obedience in the Same Direction: Discipleship in an Instant Society, 2nd ed. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVaristy Press, 2000), 204.

[3]M. Robert Mulholland, Jr., Invitation to a Journey: A Road Map for Spiritual Formation, (Downer’s Grove, Il: InterVarsity Press, 1993), 12.

[4]Willard, Divine Conspiracy, 9-10.

[5]Ibid., 57.

[6]M. Robert Mulholland, Jr., Shaped by the Word: The Power of Scripture in Spiritual Formation, (Nashville: Upper Room, 1985), 27-28.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

The B-I-B-L-E. Is that the book for me?

In the Christian tradition, there are two primary ways of reading the Bible. The more conservative, fundamentalist tradition, tends to see the Bible itself as the very Word of God, and believe it to be inspired. In the liberal tradition, it is the person who is inspired as they read the Bible, but this is not unlike any other devotional reading in the Koran or Bhagavad-Gita.[1] Mulholland points to the narrowness of both traditions and writes,

In the Christian tradition, however, there is a unique conjoining of both halves of the inspirational dynamic. God’s inspiration of the writer and God’s inspiration of the reader are two halves of a whole, and to loose either half is to erect in our hearing of the scripture a filter that will block out a tremendous amount of the living, penetrating, transforming Word of God. We might end up doing one of two things: slavishly worshiping the Bible or standing back and critically assessing and picking from among the biblical tidbits those which seem to “inspire” us. Either extreme is deadly and deadening to spiritual wholeness. There needs to be the vital conjoining of both halves of the inspirational equation.[2]

This balance of reading, as suggested here by Mulholland, is with both perspectives in mind. This allows the Bible to both come alive for the contemporary reader, and to have authority for shaping the lives of Christians, without crushing personal liberty.


[1]M. Robert Mulholland, Jr., Shaped by the Word: The Power of Scripture in Spiritual Formation, (Nashville: Upper Room, 1985), 43.

[2]Ibid.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Discipleship: transforming minds for doing

The hope is to see Christ formed in the follower (Galatians 4:19), and for all persons to be found in Christ (Philippians 3:9). Following Christ and becoming his, is to do and become, what Christ was here on earth, to be obedient, and to glorify God. This is no small task! This is the vocation of disciples. How does the church realistically and authentically take on this task?

Bonhoeffer says that the task is actually the same today as it was in the day that Jesus walked the earth in bodily form, that everyone must hear his call in the ministry of the Word and Sacrament.[1] Bonhoeffer goes on to say,

Here he is, the same Christ whom the disciples encountered, the same Christ whole and entire. Yes, here he is already, the glorified, victorious and living Lord. Only Christ himself can tell us to follow him. But discipleship never consists in this or that specific action: it is always a decision, either for or against Jesus Christ. Hence our situation is not a whit less clear than that of the disciple or the publican in the gospel. When Jesus called his first disciples, they obeyed and followed him because they recognized him as the Christ.[2]

While this is simple in terms of clarity, it is deeply profound. The job of today’s follower is not to drop their nets like Peter, or to leave the publicans job at the gate as Matthew did. That was what they did, but that is not the call to discipleship. The call to discipleship is not to travel the world establishing churches and to suffer as Paul did. The task of today’s disciple is like that of Jesus, to obey God, and bring God glory. This was the same task that was given to the people of God in the Christian Old Testament, only without the living example of Jesus Christ. Bonhoeffer said, “The Scriptures do not present us with a series of Christian types to be imitated according to choice: they preach to us in every situation the one Jesus Christ. To Christ alone must I listen.”[3] Flavil Yeakley, in his book, The Discipling Dilemma drives this home when he writes, ‘“Discipleship is not running people through a machine and producing Xerox copies.’ Too many people have seen discipling as putting people on a conveyor belt of godliness, and after so many weeks or months or years, having them go off the conveyor belt at the far end with a big “D” stamped on their foreheads meaning “discipled.” Those who come off the conveyor belt seem so identical. This certainly disagrees with Scripture.”[4] Disciples of Jesus Christ are not made in molds. The goal is not conforming to church culture or social norms, but for persons to be transformed in their mind and renewed in their thinking so that they live in accord with the will of God (Romans 12:2).



[1]Bonhoeffer, 250

[2]Ibid.

[3]Ibid., 253.

[4]Flavil R. Yeakley, Jr., Howard W. Norton, Don Vinzant, Gene Vinzant, The Discipling Dilemma, ed. Flavil R. Yeakley, Jr., (Nashville: Gospel Advocate, 1988), 148.